|
|
|---|
Monday, December 25, 2006
http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?GOOG
I am on vacation and will post only ocationally.
Thursday, December 14, 2006
Cleland says the new plan will enable employees to "rush for the exits", creating a short-term culture in which employees don't care about the company's long-term value. He says a restricted stock plan would be much better, because it is long-term focused. What he may be missing is that the new options vest on the same schedule as the old ones and on the same type of schedule that "restricted stock" would vest. Employees will not be able to sell the new options sooner than the old options. They will just be able to collect some of the "time value" of the options that they would otherwise give up if they did not hold the options to term. This feature might encourage employees to sell earlier, but it should not trigger a rush for the exits any more than a cash salary would trigger one.
Cleland says the new program tells us that Google is having trouble hiring enough smart people because the stock price is so high (implication: they know it's overvalued). This may be true, but it doesn't undermine the idea of transferable options.
Cleland suggests that the program will lead to even more dilution for shareholders. This is only true if Google grants more options than they would have under the old program. They will probably do exactly the reverse: grant fewer options (because each option will be worth more). What Cleland may be missing is that by "transfering" their options to an investment bank, the employees will NOT be exercising the options. They will merely be selling them to another party (which may or may not exercise them at some future date). What matters is the number of options granted, not whether/when they are transferred.
Cleland says Google is arrogantly "innovating without permission" and should have checked with the SEC. According to Google, they DID check with the SEC. And, again, it's hard to see why the SEC would have a huge beef with an idea that's better for both shareholders and employees.
More alleged negatives? (I'm sure there are some--I just haven't heard any good ones yet)."
Monday, December 11, 2006
While Google is fighting with Common Sense, few guys are busy buying undervalued assets of Tenke mining (TNK.to CAD18.1), maybe they are the same guys which are advising you to buy...Google with Target Price of 600. I have been there...with strong Buy on Enron, Worldcom, Tyco...etc. We have got only one luxury in exchange for slipping away Time and our ability to Judge and make Decisions, it is Wisdom and life becoming History which can always teach something because nothing is really changing...
Sunday, December 10, 2006
How much Deal with YouTube and "Explosive Growth of Video Ads" priced into Google stock valuation?
http://internet.seekingalpha.com/article/22023?response_message=Welcome%20sufiy2004@yahoo.com!%20%20You%20are%20now%20logged%20in.
Media Giants Plot to take on YouTube
http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/newsanalysis/mediaentertainment/10326941.html?cm_ven=YAHOO&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA
"Baidu.com, China's huge search engine, may soon announce an agreement with Microsoft. So it begins. China and Microsoft: A scrappy duo that's the world's last hope against the evil they call "Google." "
http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/newsanalysis/funnymoney/10326942.html?cm_ven=YAHOO&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA
Investment Thesis: Google will bring markets down, USD will depreciate, Gold, Silver, Uranium, Energy and other Things will prevail. CS
at 4:52 AMFriday, December 8, 2006
Wednesday, December 6, 2006
http://biz.yahoo.com/ccn/061206/200612060362078001.html?.v=1&printer=1
"There is little about Google's business that is more closely guarded than the issue of click fraud. Company officials say they take the issue seriously and have zero tolerance for fraudsters who generate bogus clicks on ads in order to profit. The search giant says it detects most fraudulent clicks before advertisers are ever billed and that industry concerns are overblown. But Google won't discuss specifically how it detects bad clicks or what percent it deems fraudulent, only that it's "less than 10%," saying such information could be helpful to would-be scam artists."
"Marketers are already anxious about fraud. A study by the Search Engine Marketing Professional Organization (SEMPO) slated for release on Dec. 4 found that 71% of advertisers are "worried" about click fraud, or describe it as a "moderate" or "significant" problem. That's down slightly from a year ago, but still a sizable issue. "
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2006/tc20061204_923336.htm
Monday, December 4, 2006
Core positions hold throughout MAY sell off, increased with taken profit before blast and leverage: debt and/or options. Core Juniors GOLD/Silver/Uranium alternative energy, all bought much lower, portfolio back to May high (with Losses in Google Puts accounted) with Major Buy in HUI. Leverage is going down, profits from SNDK puts, SSRI calls rolled over into juniours. Short Google, SEMIS, Housing, Retail, General Markets. Watch out major development in WWAT.ob very risky but with new financing this baby is going sing.
Stop wasting your time here if:
1. You believe that Market is Efficient.
2. You feel very confident - Sell OUT right now and take a break for 1 month.
3. You think that USD is going up and Oil down.
4. You think that Chinese are stupid buying with USD all possible resources OIL/COAL/URANIUM/OIL Sands/Metals and not your beloved GOOGLE which will feed everybody on Mother Earth in Couple of years.
Until recent time from June Short strategy on Google is losing money and working as hedge to Major melt down in the Markets. Only Core positions and Counter trade in SSRI calls at bottom in May/June counterweight time mistakes in Google Trade. Could decisions be less emotional - for sure: then I would stop this excises, enjoy if it is up to your Vibe - a lot of money paid for this education.






.jpg)











